↓ Skip to main content

Anterior ankle arthroscopy, distraction or dorsiflexion?

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Anterior ankle arthroscopy, distraction or dorsiflexion?
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00167-010-1089-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter A. J. de Leeuw, Pau Golanó, Joan A. Clavero, C. Niek van Dijk

Abstract

Anterior ankle arthroscopy can basically be performed by two different methods; the dorsiflexion- or distraction method. The objective of this study was to determine the size of the anterior working area for both the dorsiflexion and distraction method. The anterior working area is anteriorly limited by the overlying anatomy which includes the neurovascular bundle. We hypothesize that in ankle dorsiflexion the anterior neurovascular bundle will move away anteriorly from the ankle joint, whereas in ankle distraction the anterior neurovascular bundle is pulled tight towards the joint, thereby decreasing the safe anterior working area. Six fresh frozen ankle specimens, amputated above the knee, were scanned with computed tomography. Prior to scanning the anterior tibial artery was injected with contrast fluid and subsequently each ankle was scanned both in ankle dorsiflexion and in distraction. A special device was developed to reproducibly obtain ankle dorsiflexion and distraction in the computed tomography scanner. The distance between the anterior border of the inferior tibial articular facet and the posterior border of the anterior tibial artery was measured. The median distance from the anterior border of the inferior tibial articular facet to the posterior border of the anterior tibial artery in ankle dorsiflexion and distraction was 0.9 cm (range 0.7-1.5) and 0.7 cm (range 0.5-0.8), respectively. The distance in ankle dorsiflexion significantly exceeded the distance in ankle distraction (P = 0.03). The current study shows a significantly increased distance between the anterior distal tibia and the overlying anterior neurovascular bundle with the ankle in a slightly dorsiflexed position as compared to the distracted ankle position. We thereby conclude that the distracted ankle position puts the neurovascular structures more at risk for iatrogenic damage when performing anterior ankle arthroscopy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 10 18%
Researcher 9 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 12 22%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2013.
All research outputs
#18,327,422
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#2,089
of 2,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,382
of 93,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#21
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.