↓ Skip to main content

Qualitative or Quantitative Differences Between Asperger’s Disorder and Autism? Historical Considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
18 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Qualitative or Quantitative Differences Between Asperger’s Disorder and Autism? Historical Considerations
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, June 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10803-009-0798-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Ladell Sanders

Abstract

The histories of autism and Asperger's Disorder (AD), based on original contributions by Kanner and Asperger, are reviewed in relation to DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. Their original articles appear to have influenced the distinction between AD and autism made in the DSM-IV. Based on up-to-date empirical research, however, it appears that AD and autism are not qualitatively distinct disorders, but are different quantitative manifestations of the same disorder. The differences between AD and autism may be a function of individual variability in these areas, not the manifestation of qualitatively distinct disorders. The DSM-IV criteria for AD and autism need to be considered with their historical developments, and based on empirical evidence, the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria may be subject to critical review.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 130 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 29 21%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 40 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 11%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Computer Science 7 5%
Other 30 22%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,682,800
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,472
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,561
of 114,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#23
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.