| Title |
The ‘Alice in Wonderland’ mechanics of the rejection of (climate) science: simulating coherence by conspiracism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Synthese, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-016-1198-6 |
| Authors |
Stephan Lewandowsky, John Cook, Elisabeth Lloyd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 198 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 20% |
| Australia | 19 | 10% |
| Canada | 11 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 4% |
| Germany | 6 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 3% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 85 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 145 | 73% |
| Scientists | 40 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 19 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 34 | 27% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 702. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2023.
All research outputs
#29,663
of 25,556,408 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1
of 2,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#531
of 328,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,556,408 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.