You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maternal Dietary Patterns and Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Cohort: The GUSTO Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrients, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3390/nu8090574 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jamie de Seymour, Airu Chia, Marjorelee Colega, Beatrix Jones, Elizabeth McKenzie, Cai Shirong, Keith Godfrey, Kenneth Kwek, Seang-Mei Saw, Cathryn Conlon, Yap-Seng Chong, Philip Baker, Mary F. F. Chong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 37 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2016.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nutrients
#16,303
of 21,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,430
of 330,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrients
#133
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.