↓ Skip to main content

DockBench as docking selector tool: the lesson learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2015

Overview of attention for article published in Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
DockBench as docking selector tool: the lesson learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2015
Published in
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10822-016-9966-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Veronica Salmaso, Mattia Sturlese, Alberto Cuzzolin, Stefano Moro

Abstract

Structure-based drug design (SBDD) has matured within the last two decades as a valuable tool for the optimization of low molecular weight lead compounds to highly potent drugs. The key step in SBDD requires knowledge of the three-dimensional structure of the target-ligand complex, which is usually determined by X-ray crystallography. In the absence of structural information for the complex, SBDD relies on the generation of plausible molecular docking models. However, molecular docking protocols suffer from inaccuracies in the description of the interaction energies between the ligand and the target molecule, and often fail in the prediction of the correct binding mode. In this context, the appropriate selection of the most accurate docking protocol is absolutely relevant for the final molecular docking result, even if addressing this point is absolutely not a trivial task. D3R Grand Challenge 2015 has represented a precious opportunity to test the performance of DockBench, an integrate informatics platform to automatically compare RMDS-based molecular docking performances of different docking/scoring methods. The overall performance resulted in the blind prediction are encouraging in particular for the pose prediction task, in which several complex were predicted with a sufficient accuracy for medicinal chemistry purposes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Student > Master 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Computer Science 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%