Title |
In search of novel ligands using a structure-based approach: a case study on the adenosine A2A receptor
|
---|---|
Published in |
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10822-016-9963-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eelke B. Lenselink, Thijs Beuming, Corine van Veen, Arnault Massink, Woody Sherman, Herman W. T. van Vlijmen, Adriaan P. IJzerman |
Abstract |
In this work, we present a case study to explore the challenges associated with finding novel molecules for a receptor that has been studied in depth and has a wealth of chemical information available. Specifically, we apply a previously described protocol that incorporates explicit water molecules in the ligand binding site to prospectively screen over 2.5 million drug-like and lead-like compounds from the commercially available eMolecules database in search of novel binders to the adenosine A2A receptor (A2AAR). A total of seventy-one compounds were selected for purchase and biochemical assaying based on high ligand efficiency and high novelty (Tanimoto coefficient ≤0.25 to any A2AAR tested compound). These molecules were then tested for their affinity to the adenosine A2A receptor in a radioligand binding assay. We identified two hits that fulfilled the criterion of ~50 % radioligand displacement at a concentration of 10 μM. Next we selected an additional eight novel molecules that were predicted to make a bidentate interaction with Asn253(6.55), a key interacting residue in the binding pocket of the A2AAR. None of these eight molecules were found to be active. Based on these results we discuss the advantages of structure-based methods and the challenges associated with finding chemically novel molecules for well-explored targets. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 24% |
Researcher | 6 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 6 | 18% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 15% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 12% |
Computer Science | 3 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 29% |