↓ Skip to main content

The Microbiome: a Revolution in Treatment for Rheumatic Diseases?

Overview of attention for article published in Current Rheumatology Reports, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
The Microbiome: a Revolution in Treatment for Rheumatic Diseases?
Published in
Current Rheumatology Reports, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11926-016-0614-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

James T. Rosenbaum, Mark J. Asquith

Abstract

The microbiome is the term that describes the microbial ecosystem that cohabits an organism such as humans. The microbiome has been implicated in a long list of immune-mediated diseases which include rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, and even gout. The mechanisms to account for this effect are multiple. The clinical implications from observations on the microbiome and disease are broad. A growing number of microbiota constituents such as Prevotella copri, Porphyromonas gingivalis, and Collinsella have been correlated or causally related to rheumatic disease. The microbiome has a marked effect on the immune system. Our understanding of immune pathways modulated by the microbiota such as the induction of T helper 17 (Th17) cells and secretory immunoglobulin A (IgA) responses to segmented filamentous bacteria continues to expand. In addition to the gut microbiome, bacterial communities of other sites such as the mouth, lung, and skin have also been associated with the pathogenesis of rheumatic diseases. Strategies to alter the microbiome or to alter the immune activation from the microbiome might play a role in the future therapy for rheumatic diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 147 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 39 26%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 22 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,115,954
of 23,400,864 outputs
Outputs from Current Rheumatology Reports
#75
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,912
of 322,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Rheumatology Reports
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,400,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them