↓ Skip to main content

Inclusion of coexisting morbidity in a TBSA% and age based model for the prediction of mortality after burns does not increase its predictive power

Overview of attention for article published in Burns (03054179), October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inclusion of coexisting morbidity in a TBSA% and age based model for the prediction of mortality after burns does not increase its predictive power
Published in
Burns (03054179), October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.burns.2015.09.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Pompermaier, Ingrid Steinvall, Mats Fredrikson, Folke Sjöberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 131 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 33 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 31%
Psychology 23 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Burns (03054179)
#1,359
of 2,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,463
of 297,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Burns (03054179)
#12
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,133 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.