↓ Skip to main content

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3950 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3110 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. P. Dellinger, Mitchell M. Levy, Andrew Rhodes, Djillali Annane, Herwig Gerlach, Steven M. Opal, Jonathan E. Sevransky, Charles L. Sprung, Ivor S. Douglas, Roman Jaeschke, Tiffany M. Osborn, Mark E. Nunnally, Sean R. Townsend, Konrad Reinhart, Ruth M. Kleinpell, Derek C. Angus, Clifford S. Deutschman, Flavia R. Machado, Gordon D. Rubenfeld, Steven Webb, Richard J. Beale, Jean-Louis Vincent, Rui Moreno, The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup*

Abstract

To provide an update to the "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock," last published in 2008.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 15 <1%
Italy 10 <1%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Brazil 7 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
France 4 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Other 29 <1%
Unknown 3020 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 371 12%
Researcher 363 12%
Student > Bachelor 323 10%
Student > Postgraduate 295 9%
Other 280 9%
Other 820 26%
Unknown 658 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1603 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 190 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 76 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 2%
Other 312 10%
Unknown 736 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#659,400
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#603
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,019
of 293,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.