Title |
Capture by colour: Evidence for dimension-specific singleton capture
|
---|---|
Published in |
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, May 2015
|
DOI | 10.3758/s13414-015-0927-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anthony M. Harris, Stefanie I. Becker, Roger W. Remington |
Abstract |
Previous work on attentional capture has shown the attentional system to be quite flexible in the stimulus properties it can be set to respond to. Several different attentional "modes" have been identified. Feature search mode allows attention to be set for specific features of a target (e.g., red). Singleton detection mode sets attention to respond to any discrepant item ("singleton") in the display. Relational search sets attention for the relative properties of the target in relation to the distractors (e.g., redder, larger). Recently, a new attentional mode was proposed that sets attention to respond to any singleton within a particular feature dimension (e.g., colour; Folk & Anderson, 2010). We tested this proposal against the predictions of previously established attentional modes. In a spatial cueing paradigm, participants searched for a colour target that was randomly either red or green. The nature of the attentional control setting was probed by presenting an irrelevant singleton cue prior to the target display and assessing whether it attracted attention. In all experiments, the cues were red, green, blue, or a white stimulus rapidly rotated (motion cue). The results of three experiments support the existence of a "colour singleton set," finding that all colour cues captured attention strongly, while motion cues captured attention only weakly or not at all. Notably, we also found that capture by motion cues in search for colour targets was moderated by their frequency; rare motion cues captured attention (weakly), while frequent motion cues did not. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
Researcher | 6 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Student > Master | 5 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 23 | 55% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |