| Title |
Differences between literates and illiterates on symbolic but not nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13423-011-0175-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samar Zebian, Daniel Ansari |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 86 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 25% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 44 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 6 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |