Title |
Influence of the gel thickness on in vivo hyaline cartilage regeneration induced by double-network gel implanted at the bottom of a large osteochondral defect: Short-term results
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-50 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hidetoshi Matsuda, Nobuto Kitamura, Takayuki Kurokawa, Kazunobu Arakaki, Jian Ping Gong, Fuminori Kanaya, Kazunori Yasuda |
Abstract |
A double-network (DN) gel, which is composed of poly(2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid) and poly(N,N'-dimethyl acrylamide), can induce hyaline cartilage regeneration in vivo in a large osteochondral defect. The purpose of this study was to clarify the influence of the thickness of the implanted DN gel on the induction ability of hyaline cartilage regeneration. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 31 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Librarian | 1 | 3% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 21% |
Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
Engineering | 5 | 15% |
Materials Science | 4 | 12% |
Chemistry | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,262,171
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,443
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,119
of 282,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#61
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.