| Title |
Effectiveness of a multidimensional approach for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in 11 adult intensive care units from 10 cities of Turkey: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infection, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s15010-013-0407-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. Leblebicioglu, A. N. Yalcin, V. D. Rosenthal, I. Koksal, F. Sirmatel, S. Unal, H. Turgut, D. Ozdemir, G. Ersoz, C. Uzun, S. Ulusoy, S. Esen, F. Ulger, A. Dilek, H. Yilmaz, O. Turhan, N. Gunay, E. Gumus, O. Dursun, G. Yýlmaz, S. Kaya, H. Ulusoy, M. Cengiz, L. Yilmaz, G. Yildirim, A. Topeli, S. Sacar, H. Sungurtekin, D. Uğurcan, M. F. Geyik, A. Şahin, S. Erdogan, A. Kaya, N. Kuyucu, B. Arda, F. Bacakoglu |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the impact of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) multidimensional approach on the reduction of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in adult patients hospitalized in 11 intensive care units (ICUs), from 10 hospitals, members of the INICC, in 10 cities of Turkey. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,759,103
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#362
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,757
of 281,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.