| Title |
Bringing analysis of gender and social–ecological resilience together in small-scale fisheries research: Challenges and opportunities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-016-0814-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nozomi Kawarazuka, Catherine Locke, Cynthia McDougall, Paula Kantor, Miranda Morgan |
| Abstract |
The demand for gender analysis is now increasingly orthodox in natural resource programming, including that for small-scale fisheries. Whilst the analysis of social-ecological resilience has made valuable contributions to integrating social dimensions into research and policy-making on natural resource management, it has so far demonstrated limited success in effectively integrating considerations of gender equity. This paper reviews the challenges in, and opportunities for, bringing a gender analysis together with social-ecological resilience analysis in the context of small-scale fisheries research in developing countries. We conclude that rather than searching for a single unifying framework for gender and resilience analysis, it will be more effective to pursue a plural solution in which closer engagement is fostered between analysis of gender and social-ecological resilience whilst preserving the strengths of each approach. This approach can make an important contribution to developing a better evidence base for small-scale fisheries management and policy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 229 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 43 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 59 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 48 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 64 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,947,160
of 25,137,221 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#541
of 1,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,357
of 333,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,137,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.