↓ Skip to main content

The Complex Role of Apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer’s Disease: an Overview and Update

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
Title
The Complex Role of Apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer’s Disease: an Overview and Update
Published in
Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12031-016-0839-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Mahoney-Sanchez, Abdel Ali Belaidi, Ashley I. Bush, Scott Ayton

Abstract

Apolipoprotein E (ApoE) plays a crucial role in the homeostatic control of lipids in both the periphery and the central nervous system (CNS). In humans, ApoE exists in three different isoforms: ε2, ε3 and ε4. ApoE ε3 is the most common isoform, while the ε4 isoform confers the greatest genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the mechanisms underlying how ApoE contributes to the pathogenesis of AD are still debated. ApoE has been shown to impact amyloid β (Aβ) deposition and clearance in the brain. ApoE also has Aβ-independent pathways in AD, which has led to the discovery of new roles of ApoE ranging from mitochondria dysfunction to, most recently, iron metabolism. Here, we review the role of ApoE in health and in AD, with the view of identifying therapeutic approaches that could prevent the risk associated with the ε4 isoform.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 115 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 29 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 28 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 10%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 33 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,983,081
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#61
of 1,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,791
of 328,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Neuroscience
#8
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,643 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.