↓ Skip to main content

Decreasing patient cost and travel time through pediatric rheumatology telemedicine visits

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Rheumatology, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Decreasing patient cost and travel time through pediatric rheumatology telemedicine visits
Published in
Pediatric Rheumatology, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12969-016-0116-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Kessler, Ashley K. Sherman, Mara L. Becker

Abstract

There is a critical shortage of pediatric rheumatologists in the US. Substantial travel to clinics can impose time and monetary burdens on families. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost of in-person pediatric rheumatology visits for families and determine if telemedicine clinics resulted in time and cost savings. Factors associated with interest in telemedicine were also explored. Surveys were offered to parents and guardians of patients in Pediatric Rheumatology follow-up clinics in Kansas City, Missouri, the primary site of in-person care, and at a telemedicine outreach site 160 miles away, in Joplin, Missouri. Survey questions were asked about non-medical, out-of-pocket costs associated with the appointment and interest in a telemedicine clinic. At the primary Kansas City clinic, the median distance traveled one-way was 40 miles [IQR = 18-80]. In the Joplin sample, the median distance traveled to the telemedicine clinic was 60 miles [IQR = 20-85] compared to 175 miles [IQR = 160-200] for the same cohort of patients when seen in Kansas City (p < 0.001). When the Joplin cohort was seen via telemedicine they missed less time from work and school (p = 0.028, p = 0.003, respectively) and a smaller percentage spent money on food compared to when they had traveled to Kansas City (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference between the Joplin cohort when they had traveled to Kansas City and the Kansas City cohort in terms of miles driven to clinic, time missed from work and school, and percentage of subjects who spent money on food. Traditional in-person visits can result in a financial toll on families, which can be ameliorated by the use of telemedicine. Telemedicine leveled the economic burden of clinic visits so that when the Joplin cohort was seen via telemedicine, they experienced costs similar to the Kansas City cohort.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 13%
Other 12 12%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 30 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 9%
Psychology 6 6%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 31 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,861,841
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Rheumatology
#437
of 698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,858
of 320,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Rheumatology
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.