↓ Skip to main content

Experimental tests of light-pollution impacts on nocturnal insect courtship and dispersal

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 4,909)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
Title
Experimental tests of light-pollution impacts on nocturnal insect courtship and dispersal
Published in
Oecologia, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00442-016-3723-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariel Firebaugh, Kyle J. Haynes

Abstract

Though a number of effects of artificial light pollution on behavior and physiology have been described, there is little understanding of their consequences for the growth and distribution of populations. Here, we document impacts of light pollution on aspects of firefly population ecology and underlying mating behaviors. Many firefly species have a unique communication system whereby bioluminescent flashes are used in courtship displays to find and attract mates. We performed a series of manipulative field experiments in which we quantified the effects of adding artificial nighttime lighting on abundances and total flashing activity of fireflies, courtship behaviors and mating between tethered females and free-flying males, and dispersal distances of marked individuals. We show that light pollution reduces flashing activities in a dark-active firefly species (Photuris versicolor) by 69.69 % and courtship behavior and mating success in a twilight-active species (Photinus pyralis). Though courtship behavior and mating success of Photinus pyralis was reduced by light pollution, we found no effects of light pollution on male dispersal in this species. Our findings suggest that light pollution is likely to adversely impact firefly populations, and contribute to wider discussions about the ecological consequences of sensory pollution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 161 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Bachelor 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Researcher 15 9%
Other 8 5%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 39 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 39%
Environmental Science 25 15%
Computer Science 4 2%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 52 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#296,706
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#17
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,655
of 331,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.