↓ Skip to main content

The ontogenetic ritualization of bonobo gestures

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
The ontogenetic ritualization of bonobo gestures
Published in
Animal Cognition, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10071-013-0601-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Halina, Federico Rossano, Michael Tomasello

Abstract

Great apes communicate with gestures in flexible ways. Based on several lines of evidence, Tomasello and colleagues have posited that many of these gestures are learned via ontogenetic ritualization-a process of mutual anticipation in which particular social behaviors come to function as intentional communicative signals. Recently, Byrne and colleagues have argued that all great ape gestures are basically innate. In the current study, for the first time, we attempted to observe the process of ontogenetic ritualization as it unfolds over time. We focused on one communicative function between bonobo mothers and infants: initiation of "carries" for joint travel. We observed 1,173 carries in ten mother-infant dyads. These were initiated by nine different gesture types, with mothers and infants using many different gestures in ways that reflected their different roles in the carry interaction. There was also a fair amount of variability among the different dyads, including one idiosyncratic gesture used by one infant. This gestural variation could not be attributed to sampling effects alone. These findings suggest that ontogenetic ritualization plays an important role in the origin of at least some great ape gestures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 132 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 15%
Researcher 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 23 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 37 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 26%
Social Sciences 18 13%
Linguistics 4 3%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 26 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2014.
All research outputs
#17,677,535
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#1,295
of 1,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,769
of 282,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.