↓ Skip to main content

Why Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides safe abortion care and what that involves

Overview of attention for article published in Conflict and Health, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 662)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
65 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Why Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) provides safe abortion care and what that involves
Published in
Conflict and Health, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13031-016-0086-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catrin Schulte-Hillen, Nelly Staderini, Jean-François Saint-Sauveur

Abstract

MSF responds to needs for the termination of pregnancy, including on request (TPR); it is part of the organization's work aimed at reducing maternal mortality and suffering; and preventing unsafe abortions in the countries where we work. Following the publication of "Why don't humanitarian organizations provide safe abortion care?" we offer an insight into MSF's experience over the past few years. The article looks at the legal concerns and proposes that the importance of addressing maternal mortality should replace them and the operational set-up and action organized in a way that mitigates risks. MSF took a policy decision on safe abortion care in 2004; the fact that care did not expand rapidly to relevant MSF projects came as a surprise, reflecting the important weight social norms around abortion have everywhere. The need to engage in an open dialogue with staff, relevant medical actors and at community level became more obvious. Finally the article looks some key lessons that have emerged for the organization as part of the effort to prevent ill health, maternal death and suffering caused by unwanted pregnancy and unsafe abortion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 30%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 13 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#564,543
of 25,603,577 outputs
Outputs from Conflict and Health
#18
of 662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,669
of 328,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conflict and Health
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,603,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,969 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.