| Title |
Sampling bee communities using pan traps: alternative methods increase sample size
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-016-9914-6 |
| Authors |
Joseph S. Wilson, Joshua P. Jahner, Lisa Starley, Carmelle L. Calvin, Harold Ikerd, Terry Griswold |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 15% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 26% |
| Researcher | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 74 | 57% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,972,152
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#152
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,188
of 320,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.