↓ Skip to main content

Laser capture microdissection microscopy and genome sequencing of the avian malaria parasite, Plasmodium relictum

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Laser capture microdissection microscopy and genome sequencing of the avian malaria parasite, Plasmodium relictum
Published in
Parasitology Research, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00436-016-5237-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Holly L. Lutz, Nicholas J. Marra, Felix Grewe, Jenny S. Carlson, Vaidas Palinauskas, Gediminas Valkiūnas, Michael J. Stanhope

Abstract

Acquiring genomic material from avian malaria parasites for genome sequencing has proven problematic due to the nucleation of avian erythrocytes, which produces a large ratio of host to parasite DNA (∼1 million to 1 bp). We tested the ability of laser capture microdissection microscopy to isolate parasite cells from individual avian erythrocytes for four avian Plasmodium species, and subsequently applied whole genome amplification and Illumina sequencing methods to Plasmodium relictum (lineage pSGS1) to produce sequence reads of the P. relictum genome. We assembled ∼335 kbp of parasite DNA from this species, but were unable to completely avoid contamination by host DNA and other sources. However, it is clear that laser capture microdissection holds promise for the isolation of genomic material from haemosporidian parasites in intracellular life stages. In particular, laser capture microdissection may prove useful for isolating individual parasite species from co-infected hosts. Although not explicitly tested in this study, laser capture microdissection may also have important applications for isolation of rare parasite lineages and museum specimens for which no fresh material exists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Lithuania 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 60 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 31%
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 16%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2017.
All research outputs
#3,248,995
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#163
of 3,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,810
of 320,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#2
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,791 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.