↓ Skip to main content

Symptoms and delay times during myocardial infarction in 694 patients with and without diabetes; an explorative cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Symptoms and delay times during myocardial infarction in 694 patients with and without diabetes; an explorative cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, May 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12872-016-0282-7
Pubmed ID
URN
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-124451
Authors

Karin Hellström Ängerud, Ingela Thylén, Sofia Sederholm Lawesson, Mats Eliasson, Ulf Näslund, Christine Brulin, on behalf of the SymTime Study Group

Abstract

In myocardial infarction (MI) a short pre-hospital delay, prompt diagnosis and timely reperfusion treatment can improve the prognosis. Despite the importance of timely care seeking, many patients with MI symptoms delay seeking medical care. Previous research is inconclusive about differences in symptom presentation and pre-hospital delay between patients with and without diabetes during MI. The aim of this study was to describe symptoms and patient delay during MI in patients with and without diabetes. Swedish cross-sectional multicentre survey study enrolling MI patients in 5 centres within 24 h from admittance. Chest pain was common in patients both with and without diabetes and did not differ after adjustment for age and sex. Patients with diabetes had higher risk for shoulder pain/discomfort, shortness of breath, and tiredness, but lower risk for cold sweat. The three most common symptoms reported by patients with diabetes were chest pain, pain in arms/hands and tiredness. In patients without diabetes the most common symptoms were chest pain, cold sweat and pain in arms/hands. Median patient delay time was 2 h, 24 min for patients with diabetes and 1 h, 15 min for patients without diabetes (p = 0.024). Chest pain was common both in patients with and without diabetes. There were more similarities than differences in MI symptoms between patients with and without diabetes but patients with diabetes had considerably longer delay. This knowledge is important not only for health care personnel meeting patients with suspected MI, but also for the education of people with diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 29 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 33 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,472,072
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1,119
of 1,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#252,877
of 337,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#23
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.