↓ Skip to main content

Tracking the implicit self using event-related potentials

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Tracking the implicit self using event-related potentials
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, May 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13415-013-0169-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Egenolf, Maria Stein, Thomas Koenig, Martin Grosse Holtforth, Thomas Dierks, Franz Caspar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Slovenia 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 46%
Neuroscience 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,287,458
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#618
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,460
of 195,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.