| Title |
Peer Support Providers’ Role Experiences on Interprofessional Mental Health Care Teams: A Qualitative Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Community Mental Health Journal, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10597-015-9970-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Asad, Samia Chreim |
| Abstract |
This study explores how peer support providers' roles are defined and integrated in inter-professional mental health care teams, and how these providers relate to other practitioners and clients. Interviews were conducted with peer support providers in two different formal models of peer support employment. Qualitative data analysis was undertaken. The findings indicate that: peer support providers experience ambiguity and that some ambiguity may offer benefits; peer support providers enhance team acceptance of their role through several means and strategies; setting boundaries with clients is a delicate issue that requires several considerations that we discuss. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 20% |
| Unknown | 20 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#19,406,195
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#1,015
of 1,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#274,997
of 398,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.