↓ Skip to main content

Fully-Automated μMRI Morphometric Phenotyping of the Tc1 Mouse Model of Down Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fully-Automated μMRI Morphometric Phenotyping of the Tc1 Mouse Model of Down Syndrome
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2016
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0162974
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nick M. Powell, Marc Modat, M. Jorge Cardoso, Da Ma, Holly E. Holmes, Yichao Yu, James O’Callaghan, Jon O. Cleary, Ben Sinclair, Frances K. Wiseman, Victor L. J. Tybulewicz, Elizabeth M. C. Fisher, Mark F. Lythgoe, Sébastien Ourselin

Abstract

We describe a fully automated pipeline for the morphometric phenotyping of mouse brains from μMRI data, and show its application to the Tc1 mouse model of Down syndrome, to identify new morphological phenotypes in the brain of this first transchromosomic animal carrying human chromosome 21. We incorporate an accessible approach for simultaneously scanning multiple ex vivo brains, requiring only a 3D-printed brain holder, and novel image processing steps for their separation and orientation. We employ clinically established multi-atlas techniques-superior to single-atlas methods-together with publicly-available atlas databases for automatic skull-stripping and tissue segmentation, providing high-quality, subject-specific tissue maps. We follow these steps with group-wise registration, structural parcellation and both Voxel- and Tensor-Based Morphometry-advantageous for their ability to highlight morphological differences without the laborious delineation of regions of interest. We show the application of freely available open-source software developed for clinical MRI analysis to mouse brain data: NiftySeg for segmentation and NiftyReg for registration, and discuss atlases and parameters suitable for the preclinical paradigm. We used this pipeline to compare 29 Tc1 brains with 26 wild-type littermate controls, imaged ex vivo at 9.4T. We show an unexpected increase in Tc1 total intracranial volume and, controlling for this, local volume and grey matter density reductions in the Tc1 brain compared to the wild-types, most prominently in the cerebellum, in agreement with human DS and previous histological findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 4 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 7 21%
Engineering 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Computer Science 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#15,384,989
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#131,338
of 195,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,956
of 321,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,760
of 4,175 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,175 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.