You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genetic variants in CETP increase risk of intracerebral hemorrhage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Neurology, October 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ana.24780 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher D. Anderson, Guido J. Falcone, Chia‐Ling Phuah, Farid Radmanesh, H. Bart Brouwers, Thomas W. K. Battey, Alessandro Biffi, Gina M. Peloso, Dajiang J. Liu, Alison M. Ayres, Joshua N. Goldstein, Anand Viswanathan, Steven M. Greenberg, Magdy Selim, James F. Meschia, Devin L. Brown, Bradford B. Worrall, Scott L. Silliman, David L. Tirschwell, Matthew L. Flaherty, Peter Kraft, Jeremiasz M. Jagiella, Helena Schmidt, Björn M. Hansen, Jordi Jimenez‐Conde, Eva Giralt‐Steinhauer, Roberto Elosua, Elisa Cuadrado‐Godia, Carolina Soriano, Koen M. van Nieuwenhuizen, Catharina J. M. Klijn, Kristiina Rannikmae, Neshika Samarasekera, Rustam Al‐Shahi Salman, Catherine L. Sudlow, Ian J. Deary, Andrea Morotti, Alessandro Pezzini, Joanna Pera, Andrzej Urbanik, Alexander Pichler, Christian Enzinger, Bo Norrving, Joan Montaner, Israel Fernandez‐Cadenas, Pilar Delgado, Jaume Roquer, Arne Lindgren, Agnieszka Slowik, Reinhold Schmidt, Chelsea S. Kidwell, Steven J. Kittner, Salina P. Waddy, Carl D. Langefeld, Goncalo Abecasis, Cristen J. Willer, Sekar Kathiresan, Daniel Woo, Jonathan Rosand, on behalf of the Global Lipids Genetics Consortium and International Stroke Genetics Consortium |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 47% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Guinea | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 59% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 61 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
| Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 24% |
| Unknown | 15 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 30% |
| Psychology | 7 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2022.
All research outputs
#3,790,005
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Neurology
#1,745
of 5,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,609
of 327,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Neurology
#15
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.