↓ Skip to main content

Sex ratio: a biological perspective of ‘Sex and the City’

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive BioMedicine Online, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sex ratio: a biological perspective of ‘Sex and the City’
Published in
Reproductive BioMedicine Online, January 2002
DOI 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61596-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene Pergament, Pinar Bayrak Todydemir, Morris Fiddler

Abstract

The primary sex ratio in humans differs remarkably from the theoretically expected equality of 1:1, and may be as high as 170 males to 100 females. A number of environmental, physiological and genetic factors have been observed to impact on the primary sex ratio: sexual behaviour, variation in hormonal concentrations, natural disasters, environmental pollutants and timing of conception. Nevertheless, no biological mechanism or interaction of factors has suitably explained this phenomenon, or that of the prenatal vulnerability of the male, the suspected higher sex ratio in spontaneous abortion and the male excesses in adult diseases related to the intrauterine environment. Knowledge of the environmental effects and causes of natural variation in the primary sex ratio will make possible its manipulation, which will have public health implications as well as cultural and social consequences.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Social Sciences 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,274,995
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive BioMedicine Online
#297
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,340
of 130,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive BioMedicine Online
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.