↓ Skip to main content

Dynamics of Diplostomum spathaceum infection in snail hosts at a fish farm

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Dynamics of Diplostomum spathaceum infection in snail hosts at a fish farm
Published in
Parasitology Research, March 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00436-006-0137-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anssi Karvonen, Miia Savolainen, Otto Seppälä, E. Tellervo Valtonen

Abstract

Ecologically sustainable disease prevention in intensive monocultures, such as fish farming, is based on the knowledge of the ecology of parasites and the identification of the key proportion of host populations for parasite life cycles. In this paper, we examined the life cycle dynamics of the pathogenic trematode Diplostomum spathaceum at a fish farm during a period of 1 year, focusing especially on the pattern of infection in the snail host (Lymnaea stagnalis) population, which is the key phase in the parasite life cycle regarding preventative actions. We found that (1) the infection varied seasonally in snails, being highest in late August; (2) the prevalence of infection and the proportion of individuals releasing cercariae were strongly dependent on snail size; (3) the parasite over-wintered in snails as dormant sporocysts and 4) the mortality of infected snails was not likely to differ from uninfected individuals during winter. Furthermore, the seasonality and development of the infection in the snails corresponded to the pattern of infection observed in the tracer rainbow trout caged in the farm area. This pattern of infection also indicated strong spatiality of the infection, probably because of differences in the size of the snail population between the ponds rather than differences in the prevalence of infection. Overall, present results indicate a possibility for late-summer outbreaks of D. spathaceum, but also that snail prevention at farms could be conducted more efficiently by considering both size-dependent infection and the timing of cercarial release.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 4%
Brazil 2 4%
France 1 2%
Unknown 47 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 21%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 62%
Environmental Science 5 10%
Unspecified 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2013.
All research outputs
#3,943,724
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#212
of 3,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,485
of 66,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,773 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.