Title |
Fertility and contraceptive decision-making and support for HIV infected individuals: client and provider experiences and perceptions at two HIV clinics in Uganda
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-98 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rhoda K Wanyenze, Glenn J Wagner, Nazarius M Tumwesigye, Maria Nannyonga, Fred Wabwire-Mangen, Moses R Kamya |
Abstract |
Some people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV) want to have children while others want to prevent pregnancies; this calls for comprehensive services to address both needs. This study explored decisions to have or not to have children and contraceptive preferences among PLHIV at two clinics in Uganda. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Grenada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 189 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 57 | 30% |
Researcher | 25 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
Other | 24 | 12% |
Unknown | 45 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 26% |
Social Sciences | 38 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
Psychology | 6 | 3% |
Other | 25 | 13% |
Unknown | 51 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,314,949
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,306
of 17,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,597
of 293,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#86
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.