↓ Skip to main content

Interstitial telomeric sites and Robertsonian translocations in species of Ipheion and Nothoscordum (Amaryllidaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Genetica, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Interstitial telomeric sites and Robertsonian translocations in species of Ipheion and Nothoscordum (Amaryllidaceae)
Published in
Genetica, February 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10709-016-9886-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo Souza, Andre L. L. Vanzela, Orfeo Crosa, Marcelo Guerra

Abstract

The genera Nothoscordum and Ipheion (Allioideae, Amaryllidaceae) are cytologically characterized by a dysploid series with variable numbers of metacentric and acrocentric chromosomes typical of karyotypes rearranged by Robertsonian translocations (RT). Since they have large chromosomes, low diploid numbers, and possess two telomeric motifs [the vertebrate-type (TTAGGG) n and the Arabidopsis-type (TTTAGGG) n ] they are suitable for investigating the occurrence and possible role of interstitial telomeric sites (ITS) associated with RT. We analyzed the distributions of telomeric sites in 12 species of Nothoscordum and Ipheion and found that both telomeric probes colocalized in all chromosome termini. Cloning and sequencing PCR products obtained using both telomeric primers simultaneously revealed long stretches of (TTAGGG) n and (TTTAGGG) n sequences together with degenerated telomeric sequences. Most acrocentric chromosomes have a 45S rDNA site at the terminal region of the short arms adjacent to the most distal telomeric sites. Telomeric signals were found at all chromosome ends, but ITS were also detected in a few proximal and subterminal regions in some Nothoscordum species. Although RT are common in this group of plants, our findings suggest that proximal positioning of telomeric motifs are not necessarily related to that kind of rearrangement. Rather, transposition of telomeric sequences followed by amplification, could better explain the presence of (TTAGGG) n and (TTTAGGG) n repeats at those sites. Furthermore, a few small interstitial sites found in some Nothoscordum species indicate that dispersion of these sequences was not restricted to the proximal region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,342,896
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Genetica
#630
of 715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#337,162
of 400,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetica
#13
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.