↓ Skip to main content

What patients think about E-health: patients’ perspective on internet-based cognitive behavioral treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
What patients think about E-health: patients’ perspective on internet-based cognitive behavioral treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10067-013-2175-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maaike Ferwerda, Sylvia van Beugen, Amanda van Burik, Henriët van Middendorp, Elke M. G. J. de Jong, Peter C. M. van de Kerkhof, Piet L. C. M. van Riel, Andrea W. M. Evers

Abstract

In the past decade, the use of internet-based cognitive behavioral treatments (internet-based CBT) for a wide range of patients has grown intensively. Incorporating the patients' opinions and perspective into new health care innovations might improve the quality and applicability of these innovations, as high dropout rates and low attrition are the often-reported concerns in E-health research. Most studies to date have examined patient perspectives on specific internet-based interventions that patients had participated in, and not the views of the general public. The current paper explores the perspective of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis on internet-based CBT for these patient groups. In total, 100 patients (55 % male) participated in a semi-structured telephone interview about internet-based CBT, including questions about possible advantages and disadvantages and the readiness to participate in this kind of treatment. Most patients (78 %) were prepared to participate in internet-based CBT. Patients endorsed the advantages (57 %) more often than the disadvantages (34 %). The ease of internet-based CBT and the time saved were especially appealing to patients. Main disadvantages according to patients are that not all patients will be reached due to computer illiteracy and the lack of face-to-face interaction with the therapist. The results suggest that, from the patients' perspective, internet-based CBT is a promising health care development. Further research into aspects such as therapist interaction and enhancing computer literacy might contribute to an effective way of E-health care delivery in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 120 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 13%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,022,947
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#240
of 2,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,601
of 281,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.