↓ Skip to main content

Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in polyploid wheat with the Illumina GoldenGate assay

Overview of attention for article published in Theoretical and Applied Genetics, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
254 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping in polyploid wheat with the Illumina GoldenGate assay
Published in
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00122-009-1059-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eduard Akhunov, Charles Nicolet, Jan Dvorak

Abstract

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are indispensable in such applications as association mapping and construction of high-density genetic maps. These applications usually require genotyping of thousands of SNPs in a large number of individuals. Although a number of SNP genotyping assays are available, most of them are designed for SNP genotyping in diploid individuals. Here, we demonstrate that the Illumina GoldenGate assay could be used for SNP genotyping of homozygous tetraploid and hexaploid wheat lines. Genotyping reactions could be carried out directly on genomic DNA without the necessity of preliminary PCR amplification. A total of 53 tetraploid and 38 hexaploid homozygous wheat lines were genotyped at 96 SNP loci. The genotyping error rate estimated after removal of low-quality data was 0 and 1% for tetraploid and hexaploid wheat, respectively. Developed SNP genotyping assays were shown to be useful for genotyping wheat cultivars. This study demonstrated that the GoldenGate assay is a very efficient tool for high-throughput genotyping of polyploid wheat, opening new possibilities for the analysis of genetic variation in wheat and dissection of genetic basis of complex traits using association mapping approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 9 3%
United States 6 2%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Paraguay 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 269 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 95 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 25%
Student > Master 22 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Student > Postgraduate 16 5%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 30 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 238 80%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 4%
Computer Science 3 1%
Engineering 2 <1%
Environmental Science 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 38 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,754,776
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,203
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,368
of 96,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,760 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.