You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early adolescents' motivations to defend victims in school bullying and their perceptions of student–teacher relationships: A self‐determination theory approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Adolescence, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.09.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tomas Jungert, Barbara Piroddi, Robert Thornberg |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to investigate whether various dimensions of student-teacher relationships were associated with different types of motivation to defend victims in bullying and to determine the association between these types of motivations and various bystander behaviors in bullying situations among early adolescents in Italy. Data were collected from 405 Italian adolescents who completed a survey in their classroom. Results showed that warm student-teacher relationships were positively associated with defending victims and with autonomous motivation to defend victims. In contrast, conflictual student-teacher relationships were positively associated with passive bystanding and with extrinsic motivation to defend victims. Different forms of motivation to defend were found to be mediators between student-teacher relationship qualities and bystander behaviors in school bullying. Our findings suggest that teachers should build warm and caring student-teacher relationships to enhance students' autonomous motivation to defend victims of bullying as well as their inclination to defend the victims in practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 201 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 69 | 34% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 63 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,180,530
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Adolescence
#125
of 1,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,253
of 320,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Adolescence
#3
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.