↓ Skip to main content

Predicting cancer outcomes after resection of high-risk RCC

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Urology, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting cancer outcomes after resection of high-risk RCC
Published in
Nature Reviews Urology, January 2022
DOI 10.1038/s41585-022-00568-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliet A. Usher-Smith, Grant D. Stewart

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2022.
All research outputs
#13,873,219
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Urology
#1,302
of 2,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,860
of 500,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Urology
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 500,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.