Improvements in image-guided-radiotherapy (IGRT) enable accurate and precise radiotherapy treatments of moving tumors in the abdomen while simultaneously sparing healthy tissue. However, the lack of validation tools for newly developed IGRT hybrid devices such as MR-Linac is an open issue. This study presents an abdominal phantom with respiratory organ motion and multimodal imaging contrast to perform end-to-end tests in IGRT. The abdominal phantom contains anatomically shaped liver and kidney models made of Ni-DTPA and KCl-doped agarose mixtures that can be reproducibly positioned within the phantom. Organ models are wrapped in foil to avoid ion exchange with the surrounding agarose-based fatty tissue and to allow stable imaging contrast. Breathing motion is realized by a diaphragm connected to an actuator that is hydraulically controlled via a programmable logic controller (PLC). With this system, artificial and patient-specific breathing patterns can be carried out. In 1.5 and 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) series, diaphragm, liver and kidney motion was measured and compared to the breathing motion of a healthy male volunteer for different breathing amplitudes including shallow, normal and deep breathing. The constructed abdominal phantom demonstrated tissue-equivalent contrast in CT as well as in MRI. T1-weighted (T1w) and T2-weighted (T2w) relaxation times and CT-numbers were 552.9 ms, 48.2 ms and 48.8 HU (liver) and 950.42 ms, 79 ms and 28.2 HU (kidney), respectively. These values were stable for more than one month. Extracted breathing motion from a healthy volunteer revealed a liver to diaphragm motion ratio (LDMR) of 64.4 % and a kidney to diaphragm motion ratio (KDMR) of 30.7 %. Well-comparable values were obtained for the phantom (LDMR: 65.5 %, KDMR: 27.5 %). The abdominal phantom demonstrated anthropomorphic imaging contrast and physiological motion pattern in MRI and CT. This allows for wide use in the validation of IGRT.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2022.
All research outputs
#26,200,408
of 32,721,978 outputs
Outputs from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#5,603
of 7,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#416,833
of 567,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physics in Medicine & Biology
#29
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,721,978 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,108 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 567,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
