You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
City planning and population health: a global challenge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30066-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Billie Giles-Corti, Anne Vernez-Moudon, Rodrigo Reis, Gavin Turrell, Andrew L Dannenberg, Hannah Badland, Sarah Foster, Melanie Lowe, James F Sallis, Mark Stevenson, Neville Owen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 109 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 16 | 15% |
| United States | 12 | 11% |
| Spain | 11 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| South Africa | 3 | 3% |
| Mongolia | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 61% |
| Scientists | 24 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1373 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 192 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 188 | 14% |
| Researcher | 172 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 109 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 69 | 5% |
| Other | 231 | 17% |
| Unknown | 425 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 161 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 121 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 115 | 8% |
| Engineering | 85 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 5% |
| Other | 317 | 23% |
| Unknown | 521 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1052. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,187
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#440
of 42,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234
of 330,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#9
of 520 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,994 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 520 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.