You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Review: A systematic review of quality of life measures for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, June 2011
|
DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01427.x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. Townsend‐White, A. N. T. Pham, M. V. Vassos |
Abstract |
The quality of life (QOL) construct is proposed as a method to assess service outcomes for people utilising disability services. With this in mind, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of available QOL measures for people with intellectual disability (ID) to pinpoint psychometrically sound measures that can be routinely used for service evaluation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 173 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 17% |
Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
Researcher | 25 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
Other | 30 | 17% |
Unknown | 37 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 43 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 43 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 10% |
Unknown | 42 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2013.
All research outputs
#16,642,310
of 24,484,013 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#1,133
of 1,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,306
of 118,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,484,013 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.