↓ Skip to main content

Review: A systematic review of quality of life measures for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review: A systematic review of quality of life measures for people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviours
Published in
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, June 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01427.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Townsend‐White, A. N. T. Pham, M. V. Vassos

Abstract

The quality of life (QOL) construct is proposed as a method to assess service outcomes for people utilising disability services. With this in mind, the aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of available QOL measures for people with intellectual disability (ID) to pinpoint psychometrically sound measures that can be routinely used for service evaluation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 173 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Student > Master 26 15%
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 37 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 43 24%
Social Sciences 43 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 42 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2013.
All research outputs
#16,642,310
of 24,484,013 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#1,133
of 1,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,306
of 118,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
#14
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,484,013 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.