↓ Skip to main content

Sleep deprivation reduces perceived emotional intelligence and constructive thinking skills

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep Medicine, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 3,783)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
40 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
298 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
537 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sleep deprivation reduces perceived emotional intelligence and constructive thinking skills
Published in
Sleep Medicine, August 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.sleep.2007.07.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

William D.S. Killgore, Ellen T. Kahn-Greene, Erica L. Lipizzi, Rachel A. Newman, Gary H. Kamimori, Thomas J. Balkin

Abstract

Insufficient sleep can adversely affect a variety of cognitive abilities, ranging from simple alertness to higher-order executive functions. Although the effects of sleep loss on mood and cognition are well documented, there have been no controlled studies examining its effects on perceived emotional intelligence (EQ) and constructive thinking, abilities that require the integration of affect and cognition and are central to adaptive functioning.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 537 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 518 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 92 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 15%
Student > Master 73 14%
Researcher 50 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 43 8%
Other 114 21%
Unknown 86 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 198 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 58 11%
Neuroscience 30 6%
Social Sciences 28 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 4%
Other 88 16%
Unknown 113 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 487. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#55,030
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Sleep Medicine
#21
of 3,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49
of 82,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep Medicine
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.