↓ Skip to main content

Predicting stillbirth in a low resource setting

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Predicting stillbirth in a low resource setting
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, September 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12884-016-1061-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gbenga A. Kayode, Diederick E. Grobbee, Mary Amoakoh-Coleman, Ibrahim Taiwo Adeleke, Evelyn Ansah, Joris A. H. de Groot, Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch

Abstract

Stillbirth is a major contributor to perinatal mortality and it is particularly common in low- and middle-income countries, where annually about three million stillbirths occur in the third trimester. This study aims to develop a prediction model for early detection of pregnancies at high risk of stillbirth. This retrospective cohort study examined 6,573 pregnant women who delivered at Federal Medical Centre Bida, a tertiary level of healthcare in Nigeria from January 2010 to December 2013. Descriptive statistics were performed and missing data imputed. Multivariable logistic regression was applied to examine the associations between selected candidate predictors and stillbirth. Discrimination and calibration were used to assess the model's performance. The prediction model was validated internally and over-optimism was corrected. We developed a prediction model for stillbirth that comprised maternal comorbidity, place of residence, maternal occupation, parity, bleeding in pregnancy, and fetal presentation. As a secondary analysis, we extended the model by including fetal growth rate as a predictor, to examine how beneficial ultrasound parameters would be for the predictive performance of the model. After internal validation, both calibration and discriminative performance of both the basic and extended model were excellent (i.e. C-statistic basic model = 0.80 (95 % CI 0.78-0.83) and extended model = 0.82 (95 % CI 0.80-0.83)). We developed a simple but informative prediction model for early detection of pregnancies with a high risk of stillbirth for early intervention in a low resource setting. Future research should focus on external validation of the performance of this promising model.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 22%
Student > Postgraduate 14 12%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 34 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 13%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 39 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,981,478
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,933
of 4,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,691
of 320,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#54
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.