↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of Systemic Hypertension among Adults with Perinatally Acquired HIV

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC), September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patterns of Systemic Hypertension among Adults with Perinatally Acquired HIV
Published in
Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC), September 2016
DOI 10.1177/2325957416668034
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick Ryscavage, Thomas Macharia, Lino R. Trinidad, Susan Lovelace, Vicki Tepper, Robert Redfield

Abstract

Patients with perinatally acquired HIV may be at risk for the development of age-related non-AIDS diseases. The primary aim of this study was to describe patterns of systemic hypertension among a cohort of adults (≥18 years) with perinatally acquired HIV. A retrospective cohort study was conducted among adults (≥18 years) with perinatally acquired HIV infection. Primary outcomes included documentation of systemic hypertension as well as several additional non-AIDS-associated illnesses. Systemic hypertension incidence rates and rate ratios (RRs) were calculated among groups aged ≥18 and <18 years at the time of hypertension diagnosis. The overall prevalence of hypertension in the cohort (N = 109) was 26.6%, and the incidence rate of hypertension was significantly higher among those aged ≥18 years compared to those who are aged <18 years at the time of diagnosis (RR: 10.0, CI: 7.29-13.71). By multivariable analysis, only coexisting renal disease was associated with an increased risk of hypertension diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Unspecified 1 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2016.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC)
#529
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,244
of 328,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care (JIAPAC)
#23
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.