↓ Skip to main content

Melanoma prone families with CDK4 germline mutation: phenotypic profile and associations with MC1R variants

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Genetics, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Melanoma prone families with CDK4 germline mutation: phenotypic profile and associations with MC1R variants
Published in
Journal of Medical Genetics, February 2013
DOI 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101455
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanne Eknes Puntervoll, Xiaohong R Yang, Hildegunn Høberg Vetti, Ingeborg M Bachmann, Marie Françoise Avril, Meriem Benfodda, Caterina Catricalà, Stéphane Dalle, Anne B Duval-Modeste, Paola Ghiorzo, Paola Grammatico, Mark Harland, Nicholas K Hayward, Hui-Han Hu, Thomas Jouary, Tanguy Martin-Denavit, Aija Ozola, Jane M Palmer, Lorenza Pastorino, Dace Pjanova, Nadem Soufir, Solrun J Steine, Alexander J Stratigos, Luc Thomas, Julie Tinat, Hensin Tsao, Rūta Veinalde, Margaret A Tucker, Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets, Julia A Newton-Bishop, Alisa M Goldstein, Lars A Akslen, Anders Molven

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 112 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 26 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,307,911
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#514
of 3,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,528
of 292,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.