You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quality-assured screening for diabetic retinopathy delivered in primary care in Ireland: an observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp13x663091 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sheena McHugh, Claire Buckley, Katie Murphy, Sue Doherty, Gabrielle O'Keeffe, Joseph Alade, Elizabeth Keane, Mark James, Ciaran Coughlan, John Traynor, Colin P Bradley, Ivan J Perry, Joe Moran, Diarmuid Quinlan |
| Abstract |
At present, there is no national population-based retinopathy screening programme for people in Ireland who have diabetes, such as those operating in the UK for over a decade. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 91 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 21 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 21 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2013.
All research outputs
#2,232,531
of 22,694,633 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,083
of 4,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,143
of 282,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#12
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,694,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.