↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Intratracheal Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy during Recovery and Resolution after Ventilator-induced Lung Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of Intratracheal Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy during Recovery and Resolution after Ventilator-induced Lung Injury
Published in
Anesthesiology, April 2013
DOI 10.1097/aln.0b013e318287ba08
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerard F. Curley, Bilal Ansari, Mairead Hayes, James Devaney, Claire Masterson, Aideen Ryan, Frank Barry, Timothy O’Brien, Daniel O’ Toole, John G. Laffey

Abstract

Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been demonstrated to attenuate acute lung injury when delivered by intravenous or intratracheal routes. The authors aimed to determine the efficacy of and mechanism of action of intratracheal MSC therapy and to compare their efficacy in enhancing lung repair after ventilation-induced lung injury with intravenous MSC therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
France 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 19%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Professor 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 25 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#2,806
of 6,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,511
of 212,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#24
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,641 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.