↓ Skip to main content

Correlation Between SUVmax and CT Radiomic Analysis Using Lymph Node Density in PET/CT-Based Lymph Node Staging

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nuclear Medicine, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Correlation Between SUVmax and CT Radiomic Analysis Using Lymph Node Density in PET/CT-Based Lymph Node Staging
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, September 2016
DOI 10.2967/jnumed.116.179648
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In patients with lung cancer (LC), malignant melanoma (MM), gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) and prostate cancer (PCA), N-staging is often performed by integrated (18)F-FDG-Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) (LC, MM), (68)Ga-DOTATOC-PET/CT (GEP-NET) and (68)Ga-PSMA-PET/CT (PCA): N-staging is not always accurate due to indeterminate PET-findings. To better evaluate malignant lymph node (LN) infiltration, additional surrogate parameters, especially in cases with indeterminate PET-findings, would be helpful. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) in the PET-examination might correlate with semi-automated density measurements of LN in the CT-component of the integrated PET/CT examination. After approval by the institutional review board, 1022 LNs in PET/CT-examinations of 148 patients were retrospectively analysed (LC: 327 LN out of 40 patients, MM: 224 LN out of 33 patients; GEP-NET: 217 LN out of 35 patients, PCA: 254 LN out of 40 patients). PET/CT was performed before surgery/biopsy, chemotherapy, or internal or external radiation therapy, according to the clinical schedule, patients with prior chemotherapy or radiation therapy were ruled out. LN analyses were performed on the basis of SUV-uptake 60 minutes after tracer injection and volumetric CT histogram analysis in non-contrast enhanced CT. LNs were considered positive or negative on the basis of tracer uptake, histological confirmation was not available. Of the 1022 lymph nodes, 331 had positive SUVmax-findings (3-times SUVmax of bloodpool), 86 were indeterminate (1-3 SUVmax bloodpool), 605 were negative (< SUVmax bloodpool). LNs with positive SUV-uptake had significantly higher CT-density values compared to PET-negative LN, irrespective of the cancer entity. Density measurements of LNs in patients with LC, MM, GEP-NET and PCA correlate with FDG uptake in PET, and might therefore serve as an additional surrogate parameter for the differentiation between malignant and benign LNs. A possible density threshold in clinical routine might be a 7.5 Hounsfield Units (HU) cut-off value to differentiate between malignant and benign LN infiltration, and a 20 HU cut off to exlude benign lymph node processes, especially helpful in PET-indeterminate LNs.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 108 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Other 7 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 39 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 39%
Computer Science 4 4%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 42 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,472,072
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#3,126
of 4,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,786
of 321,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Medicine
#62
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.