↓ Skip to main content

Losing Our Humanity

Overview of attention for article published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Losing Our Humanity
Published in
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, February 2013
DOI 10.1177/0146167212471205
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brock Bastian, Jolanda Jetten, Hannah Chen, Helena R. M. Radke, Jessica F. Harding, Fabio Fasoli

Abstract

People not only dehumanize others, they also dehumanize the self in response to their own harmful behavior. We examine this self-dehumanization effect across four studies. Studies 1 and 2 show that when participants are perpetrators of social ostracism, they view themselves as less human compared with when they engage in nonaversive interpersonal interactions. Perceived immorality of their behavior mediated this effect. Studies 3 and 4 highlight the behavioral consequences of self-dehumanization. The extent to which participants saw themselves as less human after perpetrating social ostracism predicted subsequent prosocial behavior. Studies 2 to 4 also demonstrate that consequences of self-dehumanization occur independently of any effects of self-esteem or mood. The findings are discussed in relation to previous work on dehumanization and self-perception. We conclude that in the context of immoral actions (self) dehumanization may be functional.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 214 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 21%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 30 13%
Researcher 21 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Other 42 19%
Unknown 36 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 116 51%
Business, Management and Accounting 30 13%
Social Sciences 22 10%
Philosophy 3 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 42 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,285,520
of 23,868,920 outputs
Outputs from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#1,144
of 2,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,617
of 289,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
#21
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,920 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,780 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.