↓ Skip to main content

Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
143 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
policy
8 policy sources
twitter
1016 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
279 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
456 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pandemic preparedness and COVID-19: an exploratory analysis of infection and fatality rates, and contextual factors associated with preparedness in 177 countries, from Jan 1, 2020, to Sept 30, 2021
Published in
The Lancet, February 2022
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00172-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

COVID-19 National Preparedness Collaborators, Thomas J Bollyky, Erin N Hulland, Ryan M Barber, James K Collins, Samantha Kiernan, Mark Moses, David M Pigott, Robert C Reiner, Reed J D Sorensen, Cristiana Abbafati, Christopher Adolph, Adrien Allorant, Joanne O Amlag, Aleksandr Y Aravkin, Bree Bang-Jensen, Austin Carter, Rachel Castellano, Emma Castro, Suman Chakrabarti, Emily Combs, Xiaochen Dai, William James Dangel, Carolyn Dapper, Amanda Deen, Bruce B Duncan, Lucas Earl, Megan Erickson, Samuel B Ewald, Tatiana Fedosseeva, Alize J Ferrari, Abraham D Flaxman, Nancy Fullman, Emmanuela Gakidou, Bayan Galal, John Gallagher, John R Giles, Gaorui Guo, Jiawei He, Monika Helak, Bethany M Huntley, Bulat Idrisov, Casey Johanns, Kate E LeGrand, Ian D Letourneau, Akiaja Lindstrom, Emily Linebarger, Paulo A Lotufo, Rafael Lozano, Beatrice Magistro, Deborah Carvalho Malta, Johan Månsson, Ana M Mantilla Herrera, Fatima Marinho, Alemnesh H Mirkuzie, Ali H Mokdad, Lorenzo Monasta, Paulami Naik, Shuhei Nomura, James Kevin O'Halloran, Christopher M Odell, Latera Tesfaye Olana, Samuel M Ostroff, Maja Pasovic, Valeria Maria de Azeredo Passos, Louise Penberthy, Grace Reinke, Damian Francesco Santomauro, Maria Inês Schmidt, Aleksei Sholokhov, Emma Spurlock, Christopher E Troeger, Elena Varavikova, Anh T Vo, Theo Vos, Rebecca Walcott, Ally Walker, Simon D Wigley, Charles Shey Wiysonge, Nahom Alemseged Worku, Yifan Wu, Sarah Wulf Hanson, Peng Zheng, Simon I Hay, Christopher J L Murray, Joseph L Dieleman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,016 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 456 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 8%
Other 33 7%
Student > Master 27 6%
Student > Bachelor 21 5%
Other 78 17%
Unknown 196 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 15%
Social Sciences 45 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 5%
Psychology 13 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 3%
Other 88 19%
Unknown 208 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1894. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2024.
All research outputs
#5,197
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#210
of 42,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266
of 522,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#10
of 291 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 291 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.