↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between cold water immersion therapy (CWIT) and light emitting diode therapy (LEDT) in short-term skeletal muscle recovery after high-intensity exercise in athletes—preliminary results

Overview of attention for article published in Lasers in Medical Science, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
Title
Comparison between cold water immersion therapy (CWIT) and light emitting diode therapy (LEDT) in short-term skeletal muscle recovery after high-intensity exercise in athletes—preliminary results
Published in
Lasers in Medical Science, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10103-010-0866-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ernesto Cesar Leal Junior, Vanessa de Godoi, José Luis Mancalossi, Rafael Paolo Rossi, Thiago De Marchi, Márcio Parente, Douglas Grosselli, Rafael Abeche Generosi, Maira Basso, Lucio Frigo, Shaiane Silva Tomazoni, Jan Magnus Bjordal, Rodrigo Álvaro Brandão Lopes-Martins

Abstract

In the last years, phototherapy has becoming a promising tool to improve skeletal muscle recovery after exercise, however, it was not compared with other modalities commonly used with this aim. In the present study we compared the short-term effects of cold water immersion therapy (CWIT) and light emitting diode therapy (LEDT) with placebo LEDT on biochemical markers related to skeletal muscle recovery after high-intensity exercise. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial was performed with six male young futsal athletes. They were treated with CWIT (5°C of temperature [SD ±1°]), active LEDT (69 LEDs with wavelengths 660/850 nm, 10/30 mW of output power, 30 s of irradiation time per point, and 41.7 J of total energy irradiated per point, total of ten points irradiated) or an identical placebo LEDT 5 min after each of three Wingate cycle tests. Pre-exercise, post-exercise, and post-treatment measurements were taken of blood lactate levels, creatine kinase (CK) activity, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. There were no significant differences in the work performed during the three Wingate tests (p > 0.05). All biochemical parameters increased from baseline values (p < 0.05) after the three exercise tests, but only active LEDT decreased blood lactate levels (p = 0.0065) and CK activity (p = 0.0044) significantly after treatment. There were no significant differences in CRP values after treatments. We concluded that treating the leg muscles with LEDT 5 min after the Wingate cycle test seemed to inhibit the expected post-exercise increase in blood lactate levels and CK activity. This suggests that LEDT has better potential than 5 min of CWIT for improving short-term post-exercise recovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 2%
France 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 268 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 19%
Student > Bachelor 48 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Student > Postgraduate 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 58 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 68 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 48 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 7%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 23 8%
Unknown 75 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,239,019
of 24,494,826 outputs
Outputs from Lasers in Medical Science
#72
of 1,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,897
of 188,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lasers in Medical Science
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,494,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.