↓ Skip to main content

Enhancer RNAs

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 16: Enhancer RNAs
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Enhancer RNAs
Chapter number 16
Book title
Enhancer RNAs
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-4035-6_16
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-4033-2, 978-1-4939-4035-6
Authors

Brown, Alexander, Woods, Wendy S, Perez-Pinera, Pablo, Alexander Brown, Wendy S. Woods, Pablo Perez-Pinera M.D., Ph.D., Pablo Perez-Pinera

Editors

Ulf Andersson Ørom

Abstract

The discovery of the prokaryotic CRISPR-Cas (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats-CRISPR-associated) system and its adaptation for targeted manipulation of DNA in diverse species has revolutionized the field of genome engineering. In particular, the fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to any number of transcriptional activator domains has resulted in an array of easily customizable synthetic transcription factors that are capable of achieving robust, specific, and tunable activation of target gene expression within a wide variety of tissues and cells. This chapter describes key experimental design considerations, methods for plasmid construction, gene delivery protocols, and procedures for analysis of targeted gene activation in mammalian cell lines using CRISPR-Cas transcription factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Professor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 48%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Computer Science 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2016.
All research outputs
#14,272,830
of 22,889,074 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,199
of 13,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,295
of 420,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#367
of 1,074 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,889,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,074 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.