↓ Skip to main content

Personality-dependent differences in problem-solving performance in a social context reflect foraging strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioural Processes, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Personality-dependent differences in problem-solving performance in a social context reflect foraging strategies
Published in
Behavioural Processes, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lies Zandberg, John L. Quinn, Marc Naguib, Kees van Oers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 26%
Student > Master 24 16%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 3%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 25 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 55%
Psychology 14 9%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 32 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,393,735
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Behavioural Processes
#368
of 2,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,899
of 333,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioural Processes
#7
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,227 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.