↓ Skip to main content

In vitro acute and developmental neurotoxicity screening: an overview of cellular platforms and high-throughput technical possibilities

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
In vitro acute and developmental neurotoxicity screening: an overview of cellular platforms and high-throughput technical possibilities
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00204-016-1805-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Béla Z. Schmidt, Martin Lehmann, Simon Gutbier, Erastus Nembo, Sabrina Noel, Lena Smirnova, Anna Forsby, Jürgen Hescheler, Hasan X. Avci, Thomas Hartung, Marcel Leist, Julianna Kobolák, András Dinnyés

Abstract

Neurotoxicity and developmental neurotoxicity are important issues of chemical hazard assessment. Since the interpretation of animal data and their extrapolation to man is challenging, and the amount of substances with information gaps exceeds present animal testing capacities, there is a big demand for in vitro tests to provide initial information and to prioritize for further evaluation. During the last decade, many in vitro tests emerged. These are based on animal cells, human tumour cell lines, primary cells, immortalized cell lines, embryonic stem cells, or induced pluripotent stem cells. They differ in their read-outs and range from simple viability assays to complex functional endpoints such as neural crest cell migration. Monitoring of toxicological effects on differentiation often requires multiomics approaches, while the acute disturbance of neuronal functions may be analysed by assessing electrophysiological features. Extrapolation from in vitro data to humans requires a deep understanding of the test system biology, of the endpoints used, and of the applicability domains of the tests. Moreover, it is important that these be combined in the right way to assess toxicity. Therefore, knowledge on the advantages and disadvantages of all cellular platforms, endpoints, and analytical methods is essential when establishing in vitro test systems for different aspects of neurotoxicity. The elements of a test, and their evaluation, are discussed here in the context of comprehensive prediction of potential hazardous effects of a compound. We summarize the main cellular characteristics underlying neurotoxicity, present an overview of cellular platforms and read-out combinations assessing distinct parts of acute and developmental neurotoxicology, and highlight especially the use of stem cell-based test systems to close gaps in the available battery of tests.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 12%
Neuroscience 14 9%
Chemistry 9 6%
Other 41 26%
Unknown 34 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,837,242
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#201
of 2,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,489
of 382,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#7
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.